PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2125 (109th)

Continued Benefits for Injured Military Spouses Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

5 May 2005

Last action

21 June 2005 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

Sponsors

Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY-4]

Subjects

Healthcare, Defence

Source updated

15 August 2025

Healthcare · Defence

Summary

Continued Benefits for Injured Military Spouses Act - Entitles to military health care and commissary and exchange benefits the former spouse of a member of the armed forces who performed at least 20 years of service creditable for retired pay if such spouse: (1) has not remarried; (2) had been married to such member for at least 20 years on the date of divorce or annulment, of which at least 10 years were during the period when the member was performing such service; and (3) sought a divorce or annulment due in whole or part to domestic violence involving that person or a child of that person that is substantiated by counseling or medical records, or to other circumstances that constitute unbearable conditions.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 May 2005

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 5 May 2005

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E898)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 5 May 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 5 May 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 21 June 2005

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.