Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 273 (99th)

Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1985

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 January 1985

Last action

27 October 1986 · Committee

Status

See H.R.5484.

Sponsors

Rep. Bennett, Charles E. [D-FL-3]

Subjects

Healthcare

Source updated

3 June 2026

Healthcare

Summary

Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1985 - Authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to: (1) provide assistance for drug abuse prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and related programs; and (2) use funds from the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund for such purposes.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 26 February 1985

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.

    Source: Committee

  5. 6 March 1985

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Crime.

    Source: Committee

  6. 9 May 1985

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from Justice.

    Source: Committee

  7. 25 November 1985

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

  8. 27 October 1986

    Committee

    See H.R.5484.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.