PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3327 (93rd)

A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the issuance to certain persons of judicial orders to appear for the purpose of conducting nontestimonial identification procedures, and for other purposes.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

30 January 1973

Last action

Status

Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 August 2024

Summary

Authorizes judicial officers to issue orders requiring a person to submit to nontestimonial identification procedures. Provides that the order must be based on an affidavit which sets out probable cause to believe an offense has been committed, that the person named committed the offense even though probable cause to arrest is lacking and that specified nontestimonial identification procedures would be of material aid in determining whether the person named in the affidavit committed the offense. Asserts that the court order would require the person to appear at a reasonable time and place to undergo undergo the specified identification procedures. Provides that nontestimonial identification procedures shall be conducted expeditiously where it appears that such person may flee or destroy the nontestimonial evidence. Defines "nontestimonial identification" as including fingerprints, palm prints, footprints, measurements, blood specimens, urine specimens, saliva samples, hair samples, handwriting exemplars, voice samples, photographs and lineups. (Adds 18 U.S.C. 3505)

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.