PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3358 (102nd)

To require the Bureau of Prisons to study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using prefabricated modular units for prison facilities.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

17 September 1991

Last action

19 September 1991 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration.

Sponsors

Rep. Torricelli, Robert G. [D-NJ-9]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 January 2025

Summary

Directs the Bureau of Prisons, prior to the completion of planning or award of a contract for the acquisition or construction of facilities for any medium or maximum security prison, to prepare and submit to the Congress a report that: (1) assesses the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using prefabricated modular steel cells for such facilities; and (2) describes the types of facilities for which the use of such units is feasible and cost-effective and identifies plans by the Bureau to use such units at particular prisons, and those for which such use is considered not to be feasible or cost-effective and identifies plans for particular prisons for which such use has not been considered or has been rejected.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 September 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 17 September 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 17 September 1991

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 19 September 1991

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.