PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3802 (115th)

Appalachian Regional Commission Reform Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 September 2017

Last action

19 September 2017 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management.

Sponsors

Harold Rogers

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

5 December 2025

Taxation

Summary

Appalachian Regional Commission Reform Act This bill declares that the mission of the Appalachian Regional Commission shall be to focus primarily on poverty reduction and economic development in areas in the Appalachian region with the most persistent poverty. The headquarters of the commission shall be located in that region. The bill increases from 50% to 60% the minimum amount of the grant expenditures approved by the commission that shall support activities or projects that benefit severely and persistently distressed counties and areas. The commission shall: (1) allocate at least 60% of the funds made available each fiscal year for its Area Development Program for projects in counties designated as distressed, and (2) submit an annual report on the allocation of program funds to such counties.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 September 2017

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 September 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 18 September 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 19 September 2017

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.