Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 4162 (95th)

A bill to allow Federal employment preference to certain employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and certain employees of the Indian Health Service, who are not entitled to the benefits of, or who have been adversely affected by the application of, certain Federal laws allowing employment preference to Indians.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

1 March 1977

Last action

1 March 1977 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

Sponsors

Sen. Andrews, Mark [R-ND]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 August 2024

Summary

Entitles to a civil service annuity those employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs or of the Indian Health Service: (1) who complete 25 years of service before December 31, 1989, or who become 50 years of age before December 31, 1989, but complete 20 years of service before that date ; (2) who were employed continuously from June 17, 1974, to the date of separation; and (3) who are not otherwise entitled to full retirement benefits or to an Indian preference. Sets forth the method of computation of such annuity.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 March 1977

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 1 March 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 1 March 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.