PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 4669 (105th)

Military Retired Pay Restoration Act of 1998

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

1 October 1998

Last action

13 October 1998 · Referred

Status

Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

Sponsors

Rep. Pickett, Owen B. [D-VA-2], Rep. Weldon, Curt [R-PA-7], Rep. Taylor, Gene [D-MS-5], WALTER JONES, Rep. Sisisky, Norman [D-VA-4], Rep. Ortiz, Solomon P. [D-TX-27], Rep. Watts, J. C., Jr. [R-OK-4], Rep. McHale, Paul [D-PA-15], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Kennedy, Patrick J. [D-RI-1], Del. Underwood, Robert A. [D-GU-At Large]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

21 August 2025

Defence

Summary

Military Retired Pay Restoration Act of 1998 - Amends Federal armed forces provisions to repeal: (1) a reduction in retirement pay applicable to individuals who first became members after July 31, 1986, had less than 30 years of military service, and were under 62 years of age at the time of retirement; (2) a reduced annual cost-of- living adjustment in the retired pay of such individuals; and (3) a provision restoring the full retirement amount for such individuals upon reaching 62 years of age.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 October 1998

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on National Security.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 1 October 1998

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 1 October 1998

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 13 October 1998

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

    Source: Committee

  5. 13 October 1998

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.