Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5219 (94th)

A bill to amend the Clean Air Act to impose certain procedural requirements on decisionmaking with respect to State implementation plans.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 March 1975

Last action

19 March 1975 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.

Sponsors

Rep. Van Deerlin, Lionel [D-CA-42], Rep. Rees, Thomas M. [D-CA-23], Rep. Corman, James C. [D-CA-21], Rep. Patterson, Jerry M. [D-CA-38], Rep. Hannaford, Mark W. [D-CA-34], Rep. Ketchum, William M. [R-CA-18], Rep. Burgener, Clair W. [R-CA-43], Rep. Ryan, Leo J. [D-CA-11], Rep. Hinshaw, Andrew J. [R-CA-40], Rep. Wilson, Robert C. [R-CA-41]

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

1 August 2024

Environment

Summary

Provides that any implementation plan for primary and secondary ambient air quality standards submitted by a State pursuant to the Clear Air Act shall be approved by the Administration of the Environmental Protection Agency only if the state has conducted public hearings and permitted all interested persons to present their views on the proposed plan.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 March 1975

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 19 March 1975

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 19 March 1975

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.