PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5273 (115th)

Global Fragility and Violence Reduction Act of 2018

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 March 2018

Last action

28 November 2018 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Sponsors

ELIOT ENGEL, Ted Poe, Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10], Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9], Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9], Paul Cook, Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-36], Matt Cartwright, F. SENSENBRENNER, Karen Bass, Francis Rooney, Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6], Ann Wagner, David Cicilline, Brad Sherman, John Faso

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 April 2025

Summary

Global Fragility and Violence Reduction Act of 2018 This bill directs the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to: (1) establish the Global Initiative to Reduce Fragility and Violence, related to reducing and addressing the causes of violence, violent conflict, and fragility, with a focus on 10 pilot countries to be determined by USAID; and (2) develop and submit to Congress an initial interagency implementing strategy which shall include individual pilot country plans. The bill provides for initiative and pilot plan updates. The Government Accountability Office shall review U.S. government activities in each pilot country.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 March 2018

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 14 March 2018

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 14 March 2018

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 27 September 2018

    Passed

    Committee Agreed to Seek Consideration Under Suspension of the Rules, by Unanimous Consent.

    Source: Committee

  5. 27 September 2018

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    Source: Committee

  6. 27 September 2018

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 27 November 2018

    Passed

    The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  8. 27 November 2018

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  9. 27 November 2018

    Vote

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 376 - 16 (Roll no. 421). (text: CR H9587-9589)

    Source: Floor

  10. 27 November 2018

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 376 - 16 (Roll no. 421).(text: CR H9587-9589)

    Source: Floor

  11. 27 November 2018

    Vote

    At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

    Source: Floor

  12. 27 November 2018

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5273.

    Source: Floor

  13. 27 November 2018

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9587-9591)

    Source: Floor

  14. 27 November 2018

    Floor

    Mr. Royce (CA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    Source: Floor

  15. 28 November 2018

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

28 November 2018 · passed · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended · Passed · Official source

Yes 376 · No 16 · Abstain · Absent/not voting 38

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

7 official files

Referred in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.