PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5299 (108th)

Patent Quality Assistance Act of 2004

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

8 October 2004

Last action

5 November 2004 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.

Sponsors

Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D-CA-26], Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

18 August 2025

Summary

Patent Quality Assistance Act of 2004 - Allows a person to request that the grant or reissue of a patent be reconsidered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) by filing an opposition seeking to invalidate one or more claims in the patent. Requires the Director of USPTO to issue and publish a certificate, in accordance with the final decision by the panel of three administrative patent judges, canceling any claim of the patent determined to be unpatentable and incorporating into the patent any new or amended claims determined to be patentable. Allows a third party to submit for consideration, and for inclusion in the record, prior art to determine whether the invention was known, used, in public use, or on sale or would have been obvious. Provides that a notice of a patent holder alleging infringement of the patent is not deemed to be sufficient to subject a recipient of the notice to liability for willful infringement of the patent, with exceptions. Prohibits a court from granting an injunction for violations of a right secured by a patent unless it finds that the patentee is likely to suffer irreparable harm that cannot be remedied by payment of money damages. Provides that a third party requester whose request for a reexamination results in an order is not estopped from asserting a claim which the third party requester could have raised during such reexamination proceedings. Sets forth provisions regarding circumstances under which a patent application involving a business method invention combined with computer technology would not be denied on the basis of obviousness.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 8 October 2004

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 8 October 2004

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 8 October 2004

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 11 October 2004

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1935-1936)

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 5 November 2004

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.