Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5543 (100th)

A bill to exempt certain ruling requests with respect to employee benefit plans from the user fees required under section 10511 of the Revenue Act of 1987.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 October 1988

Last action

19 October 1988 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Rep. Hefley, Joel [R-CO-5], Rep. Chandler, Rod D. [R-WA-8], Rep. DioGuardi, Joseph J. [R-NY-20]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Taxation

Summary

Amends the Revenue Act of 1987 to exempt from user fees in connection with various requests to the Internal Revenue Service: (1) any application for a favorable determination (other than for an initial determination letter) on behalf of a tax-deferred compensation plan, unless it involves an amendment to conform the plan to subsequently-enacted Federal law, regulation, or other administrative announcement; and (2) any request for a private letter ruling with respect to such a plan, unless it relates to changes in Federal law or regulations since the plan's adoption.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 October 1988

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 19 October 1988

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 19 October 1988

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.