Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 565 (116th)

AMIGOS Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

15 January 2019

Last action

4 December 2019 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1], Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21], Rep. Nunes, Devin [R-CA-22], Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17], Rep. Cox, TJ [D-CA-21], Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18], Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9], Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

Subjects

Immigration

Source updated

10 August 2026

Immigration

Summary

Advancing Mutual Interests and Growing Our Success Act or the AMIGOS Act This bill makes Portuguese nationals eligible for E-1 and E-2 nonimmigrant visas if the government of Portugal provides similar nonimmigrant status to U.S. nationals. An E-1 visa is for individuals entering the U.S. to engage in international trade, while an E-2 visa is for individuals investing a substantial amount of capital in the U.S. Both are limited to nationals from countries that have a treaty of commerce and navigation with the United States.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 January 2019

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 15 January 2019

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 15 January 2019

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 25 February 2019

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.

    Source: Committee

  5. 22 October 2019

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship Discharged.

    Source: Committee

  6. 23 October 2019

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 23 October 2019

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    Source: Committee

  8. 3 December 2019

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9189-9191)

    Source: Floor

  9. 3 December 2019

    Floor

    Mr. Cicilline moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    Source: Floor

  10. 3 December 2019

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  11. 3 December 2019

    Passed

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9189)

    Source: Floor

  12. 3 December 2019

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9189)

    Source: Floor

  13. 3 December 2019

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 565.

    Source: Floor

  14. 4 December 2019

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

8 official files

Referred in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Referred in Senate (text)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 4 December 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Referred in Senate (PDF)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 4 December 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 3 December 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 3 December 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House

    summary · EN · 3 December 2019

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 15 January 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 15 January 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 15 January 2019

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.