Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6095 (109th)

Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 September 2006

Last action

21 September 2006 · Passed

Status

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5], Rep. Souder, Mark E. [R-IN-3], Rep. Royce, Edward R. [R-CA-39], Rep. Miller, Gary G. [R-CA-42], Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5], Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48], Rep. Davis, Geoff [R-KY-4], Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4], Rep. Hostettler, John N. [R-IN-8], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Marchant, Kenny [R-TX-24], Rep. Drake, Thelma D. [R-VA-2], Rep. McCotter, Thaddeus G. [R-MI-11], Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21], Rep. King, Steve [R-IA-4]

Subjects

Immigration

Source updated

10 August 2026

Immigration

Summary

Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006 - Affirms that state and local law enforcement personnel have the inherent authority to investigate, identify, arrest, detain, or transfer to federal custody aliens in the United States (including the transportation of such aliens across state lines to detention centers) for purposes of assisting in the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws in the course of carrying out routine duties. States that such provision shall not be construed to require state or local law enforcement personnel to: (1) report the identity of a victim of, or a witness to, a criminal offense to the Secretary of Homeland Security for immigration enforcement purposes; or (2) arrest such victim or witness for an immigration violation. Expresses the sense of Congress that the Attorney General should adopt uniform guidelines for the prosecution of smuggling offenses. Directs the Attorney General, subject to the availability of appropriations, to increase the number of U.S. attorneys employed to prosecute alien smuggling cases by at least 20 in each of FY2008-FY2013. States that if a court determines that prospective relief should be ordered against the government in any civil immigration action the court shall: (1) limit the relief to the minimum necessary to correct the violation; (2) adopt the least intrusive means to correct the violation; (3) minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the adverse impact on national security, border security, immigration administration and enforcement, and public safety; and (4) provide for relief expiration on a specific date which is not later than the earliest date necessary for the government to remedy the violation. Provides that preliminary injunctive relief shall expire 90 days after entry unless otherwise determined by the court. Requires a court to promptly rule on any government motion to vacate, modify, or otherwise terminate a prospective relief order in a civil immigration action. Provides for an automatic 15-day stay of the prospective relief order. Authorizes a court to enter an order to postpone an automatic stay's effective date for up to 15 days. Provides that any order staying, suspending, delaying, or otherwise barring an automatic stay's effective date, other than an order to postpone the effective date for up to 15 days, shall be treated as an order refusing to vacate, modify, or otherwise terminate an injunction and shall be appealable. Prohibits a court in a civil immigration action from entering, approving, or continuing a consent decree that does not comply with the prospective relief requirements under this section. Permits private settlement agreements not complying with the requirements for an order granting prospective relief against the government if the terms of the agreement are not subject to court enforcement other than reinstatement of the civil proceedings that the agreement settled.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 September 2006

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 19 September 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 19 September 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 20 September 2006

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1018 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4830, H.R. 6094 and H.R. 6095. In each case, the bill shall be considered as read; no amendments shall be in order; and the previous question shall be considered as ordered to final passage, without intervening motion, except one motion to recommit.

    Source: Floor

  5. 21 September 2006

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 21 September 2006

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 21 September 2006

    Vote

    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 277 - 140 (Roll no. 468). (text: CR H6880-6881)

    Source: Floor

  8. 21 September 2006

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 277 - 140 (Roll no. 468).(text: CR H6880-6881)

    Source: Floor

  9. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H6893)

    Source: Floor

  10. 21 September 2006

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Sensenbrenner raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Sensenbrenner stated that the provisions of the instructions were not germane to the bill. Sustained by the Chair.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  11. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.

    Source: Floor

  12. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    Mr. Gutierrez moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H6891; text: CR H6891)

    Source: Floor

  13. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H6891)

    Source: Floor

  14. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4830, H.R. 6094 and H.R. 6095. In each case, the bill shall be considered as read; no amendments shall be in order; and the previous question shall be considered as ordered to final passage, without intervening motion, except one motion to recommit.

    Source: Floor

  15. 21 September 2006

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1018. (consideration: CR H6880-6894)

    Source: Floor

  16. 21 September 2006

    Passed

    Rule H. Res. 1018 passed House.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

8 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 21 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 21 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Referred in Senate (text)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 21 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Referred in Senate (PDF)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 21 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House without amendment

    summary · EN · 21 September 2006

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 19 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 19 September 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 19 September 2006

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.