Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6194 (112th)

U.S. Agricultural Sector Relief Act of 2012

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 July 2012

Last action

19 September 2012 · Reported

Status

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 491.

Sponsors

Rep. Gingrey, Phil [R-GA-11], Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-OK-3], Rep. Whitfield, Ed [R-KY-1], Rep. Walden, Greg [R-OR-2], Rep. Terry, Lee [R-NE-2], Rep. Southerland, Steve II [R-FL-2], Rep. Rooney, Thomas J. [R-FL-17], Rep. Schmidt, Jean [R-OH-2], Rep. Ellmers, Renee L. [R-NC-2], Rep. Conaway, K. Michael [R-TX-11], Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21], Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2], Rep. Hartzler, Vicky [R-MO-4], Rep. Kingston, Jack [R-GA-1]

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

7 April 2025

Environment

Summary

U.S. Agricultural Sector Relief Act of 2012 - Amends the Clean Air Act to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), pursuant to an application submitted by any person, to seek a critical use exemption under the Montreal Protocol to allow the production, importation, and consumption of methyl bromide: (1) for any approved critical use that is determined by the Administrator to be a critical use for the applicant, and (2) in the amount necessary for such use. Prohibits the Administrator from denying such an application or reducing the amount requested unless the Administrator: (1) has substantial evidence that there is a technically and economically feasible alternative available to the applicant for such use of methyl bromide, and (2) provides such evidence to the applicant in writing. Requires the Administrator, pursuant to an application, to allow the production, importation, and consumption of methyl bromide for any approved critical use in response to an emergency event, in an amount necessary for such use, not to exceed: (1) per emergency event at a specific location, 20 metric tons, or (2) in the aggregate for emergency use in the United Sates in a year, the total amount authorized pursuant to the Montreal Protocol process for critical uses in the United States in calendar year 2011. Requires the Administrator to ensure that sufficient quantities of methyl bromide are available for research on methyl bromide alternatives for the agricultural sector. Requires the Administrator to review, and adjust as appropriate, any critical use nomination for production, importation, or consumption of methyl bromide in the United States that has been submitted to the Parties to the Montreal Protocol if: (1) a methyl bromide alternative is removed from the U.S. market; and (2) on the basis of the availability of such alternative, the Administrator denied, or reduced the amount requested under, any application for production, importation, or consumption of methyl bromide for the year covered by such nomination.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 July 2012

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 July 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 July 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 27 July 2012

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.

    Source: Committee

  5. 19 September 2012

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 491.

    Source: Calendars

  6. 19 September 2012

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 112-679.

    Source: Committee

  7. 19 September 2012

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 112-679.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 19 September 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 19 September 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to House without amendment

    summary · EN · 19 September 2012

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 July 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 July 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 25 July 2012

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.