PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6422 (114th)

Commuter Access Reform Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

1 December 2016

Last action

1 December 2016 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Peter Roskam, Earl Blumenauer

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

12 August 2025

Taxation

Summary

Commuter Access Reform Act This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to treat transportation provided by an employer's qualified alternative commuter program as a qualified transportation fringe benefit that is excluded from an employee's gross income. A "qualified alternative commuter program" reimburses an employee for the cost of certain ride-share commuting transportation between the employee's residence, place of employment, or a mass transit facility. The benefit applies to ride-sharing commuting transportation in a commuter vehicle provided by a transportation network company if: (1) it is designed to provide service to multiple passengers with fully or partially overlapping journeys, and (2) the fare for each passenger is determined at the beginning of the trip and is based on the transportation having multiple riders. The benefit is subject to a limit on the aggregate amount of transportation fringe benefits for parking and an alternative commuter program that may be excluded from gross income.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 December 2016

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 1 December 2016

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 1 December 2016

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.