PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6566 (117th)

Freedom to Repair Act of 2022

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 February 2022

Last action

2 February 2022 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Mondaire Jones, Victoria Spartz, Katie Porter, Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1], Diana DeGette

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 January 2025

Summary

Freedom to Repair Act of 2022 This bill exempts actions related to the repair of digital electronic equipment from certain copyright-related prohibitions. Generally, current federal copyright law prohibits (1) circumventing technological measures (e.g., copy protection technology) that effectively control access to a copyright-protected work; or (2) trafficking (e.g., manufacturing or importing) in products, technologies, or services primarily designed or produced for such acts of circumvention. Under this bill, such an act of circumvention or trafficking shall not be prohibited if the act is for the purpose of diagnosing, maintaining, or repairing digital electronic equipment. However, this bill shall not apply to (1) a manufacturer or distributor of a medical device or digital electronic product (or embedded software) manufactured for use in a medical setting, or (2) any product or service offered by such a manufacturer or distributor.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 February 2022

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 2 February 2022

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 February 2022

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.