Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 88 (93rd)

A bill to further amend the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, as amended, to provide that Federal Buildings shall be designed and constructed to maximize fallout protection and that non-Federal construction financed in whole or in part with Federal funds may be designed to maximize fallout protection.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 January 1973

Last action

3 January 1973 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors

Rep. Bennett, Charles E. [D-FL-3]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

6 June 2025

Defence

Summary

Provides that Federal buildings shall be designed and construced to maximize fallout protection and that non-Federal construction financed in whole or in part with Federal funds may be designed to maximize fallout protection. Limits expenditures for the construction of such a building to 1 percent of the project's cost. Authorizes the President to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this Act, including a provision for exemptions to the requirements specified in this Act.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 January 1973

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 January 1973

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 January 1973

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.