PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 1653 (95th)

A bill to amend the Truth-in-Lending Act to facilitate administrative enforcement.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

9 June 1977

Last action

Status

Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Amends the Truth in Lending Act to redefine the term "open end credit" for purposes of disclosure requirements. Augments the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to enforce the requirements of the Truth in Lending Act by deeming violations to be unfair or deceptive practices for purposes of the Federal Trade Commission Act regardless of jurisdictional tests contained in such Act. Permits any agency having jurisdiction over an original creditor in a proceeding involving the right to recission to join to the proceeding any subsequent assignee for purposes of enforcing such right. Extends aggrieved consumers a right of action in Federal district courts in order to enforce the right to rescind. Tolls the three-year limitation on the enforcement of the right of rescission if any administrative agency institutes a formal proceeding regarding recission within that period. States that the notice of billing required under the Fair Credit Billing Act shall list the type of errors which a consumer is entitled to dispute. Requires creditors to make a good faith effort to refund credit balances due consumers if such amount remains in the account for over six months.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.