Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 1655 (99th)

Unfair Foreign Competition Act of 1985

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 September 1985

Last action

1 August 1986 · Committee

Status

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 769.

Sponsors

Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA], Sen. Dole, Robert J. [R-KS], Sen. Cohen, William S. [R-ME], Sen. Dixon, Alan J. [D-IL], Sen. Heflin, Howell [D-AL], Sen. Heinz, John [R-PA], Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA], Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK], Sen. Byrd, Robert C. [D-WV], Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY], Sen. Kasten, Robert W., Jr. [R-WI], Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC], Sen. Denton, Jeremiah [R-AL], Sen. Inouye, Daniel K. [D-HI]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Unfair Foreign Competition Act of 1985 - Amends the Clayton Act to include a specified antidumping provision among U.S. antitrust laws. Amends such antidumping provision of the Unfair Competition Act of 1916 to allow any person who is injured in her or his property or business by the sale or importation of an article made in a foreign country to bring a civil action against the manufacturer, exporter, or related importer of such article if: (1) the article is imported or sold in the United States at less than its foreign market or constructed value; and (2) such sale or importation causes or threatens material injury to U.S. industry or labor or prevents the establishment or modernization of U.S. industry. (Currently, the cause of such an action is predicated on the intent of the importer to injure or prevent the establishment of U.S. industry or to monopolize trade.) Restricts the court jurisdiction of such an action to the district court of the District of Columbia or the Court of International Trade. Entitles a prevailing plaintiff in such an action to appropriate equitable relief or, if such relief is inadequate, to compensatory damages, and legal expenses (currently, treble damages and legal expenses). Declares that the standard of proof in such an action is a preponderance of the evidence. Places the burden of proof for rebutting a prima facie case on the defendant. Includes within the meaning of prima facie case a finding by the International Trade Commission (ITC) that dumping exists. Authorizes the court to: (1) issue subpoenas to be enforced in any judicial district; (2) enjoin importation of articles allegedly dumped pending the defendant's compliance with any court order; (3) review, in camera, confidential or privileged material; (4) accept material under seal; and (5) disclose such material. Requires expedited treatment of such actions. Sets a four-year statute of limitations for actions under this Act. Requires the foreign market value or constructed value of an article to include the amount of any subsidy provided to the manufacturer, producer, or exporter of the article. Expresses the sense of the Congress that this Act is consistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Allows any person who is injured in his or her business or property by the fraudulent, grossly negligent, or negligent entry or introduction of merchandise into U.S. commerce to bring a civil action in the district court of the District of Columbia or the Court of International Trade, without respect to the amount in controversy. Entitles a person prevailing in such an action to appropriate equitable relief or, if such relief is inadequate, compensatory damages, and legal expenses. Permits the United States to intervene in an action under this Act as a matter of right. Subjects any court order under this Act to nullification by the President pursuant to authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 September 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 September 1985

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 26 September 1985

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary requested executive comment from Federal Trade Commission, Commerce Department, Treasury Department, Justice Department, Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

    Source: Committee

  4. 18 October 1985

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary received executive comment from Federal Trade Commission.

    Source: Committee

  5. 20 November 1985

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held.

    Source: Committee

  6. 11 December 1985

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary received executive comment from Department of Commerce.

    Source: Committee

  7. 4 February 1986

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary received executive comment from Department of Justice.

    Source: Committee

  8. 12 February 1986

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary received executive comment from Department of the Treasury.

    Source: Committee

  9. 18 February 1986

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary received executive comment from Office of the United States Trade Representative.

    Source: Committee

  10. 20 March 1986

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 561.

    Source: Calendars

  11. 20 March 1986

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    Source: Committee

  12. 20 March 1986

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Thurmond without amendment. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

  13. 13 May 1986

    Floor

    By Senator Thurmond from Committee on Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 99-295.

    Source: Floor

  14. 13 May 1986

    Committee

    By Senator Thurmond from Committee on Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 99-295.

    Source: Committee

  15. 20 June 1986

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Finance by unanimous consent for a period not to extend beyond August 1, 1986; Provided that any amendments reported by the Committee on Finance relating to the subject matter of the bill shall be in order.

    Source: IntroReferral

  16. 18 July 1986

    Committee

    Subcommittee on International Trade. Hearings held.

    Source: Committee

  17. 1 August 1986

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 769.

    Source: Calendars

  18. 1 August 1986

    Discharge

    Senate Committee on Finance discharged. Pursuant to the order of June 20, 1986.

    Source: Discharge

  19. 1 August 1986

    Committee

    Senate Committee on Finance discharged. Pursuant to the order of June 20, 1986.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.