Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 1737 (108th)

Gasoline Free Market Competition Act of 2003

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

15 October 2003

Last action

30 March 2004 · Introduced

Status

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3317)

Sponsors

Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA], Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA], Sen. Feingold, Russell D. [D-WI], Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Gasoline Free Market Competition Act of 2003 - Amends the Clayton Act to prohibit any person engaging in commerce from: (1) imposing any condition, agreement, or understanding between a crude oil refiner and a motor fuel distributor that limits or prevents the distributor from supplying branded gasoline to independent motor fuel retailers in a highly concentrated market, unless the limitation can be proven not to injure, destroy, or limit competition; (2) selling the same brand of gasoline (if that person is a refiner) to retailers owned or controlled by that refiner in a highly concentrated market at different prices than the refiner charges to its independent dealers, or selling to independent dealers in the same relevant geographic market at different prices if those dealers are located in a highly concentrated market; or (3) engaging in any other practice that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) determines would be likely to reduce supply or increase the price of gasoline in a highly concentrated market. Directs the FTC or the Attorney General to provide notice to each refiner, distributor, and retailer doing business in a highly concentrated market that such market is a "consumer watch zone" subject to specified conditions. Prohibits the FTC or the Attorney General from approving any combination that would create a highly concentrated market that would injure, destroy, or limit competition. Authorizes State attorneys general to bring civil actions in U.S. district court.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 October 2003

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 15 October 2003

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S12621)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 15 October 2003

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 22 March 2004

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2836-2839)

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 30 March 2004

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3317)

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 15 October 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 15 October 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 15 October 2003

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.