Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 1758 (97th)

A bill to amend title 17 of the United States Code to exempt the private noncommercial recording of copyrighted works on video recorders from copyright infringement.

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

21 October 1981

Last action

21 April 1982 · Committee

Status

Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held.

Sponsors

Sen. DeConcini, Dennis [D-AZ], Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY], Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC], Sen. Gorton, Slade [R-WA], Sen. Metzenbaum, Howard M. [D-OH], Sen. Huddleston, Walter (Dee) [D-KY], Sen. Hollings, Ernest F. [D-SC], Sen. Garn, E. J. (Jake) [R-UT], Sen. Quayle, Dan [R-IN], Sen. Roth Jr., William V. [R-DE], Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK], Sen. Denton, Jeremiah [R-AL], Sen. Durenberger, Dave [R-MN], Sen. Danforth, John C. [R-MO]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Amends the copyright law to exempt the private, noncommercial recording and use of copyrighted works on a video recorder from copyright infringement.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 October 1981

    Introduced

    Read second time and referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 21 October 1981

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 30 November 1981

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held.

    Source: Committee

  4. 21 April 1982

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.