Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 18 (112th)

Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 January 2011

Last action

25 January 2011 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Sponsors

Sen. Johanns, Mike [R-NE], Sen. Manchin, Joe, III [D-WV], Sen. Alexander, Lamar [R-TN], Sen. Ayotte, Kelly [R-NH], Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY], Sen. Begich, Mark [D-AK], Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO], Sen. Blunt, Roy [R-MO], Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR], Sen. Brown, Scott P. [R-MA], Sen. Burr, Richard [R-NC], Sen. Chambliss, Saxby [R-GA], Sen. Coats, Daniel [R-IN], Sen. Coburn, Tom [R-OK], Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME], Sen. Corker, Bob [R-TN], Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX], Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID], Sen. Ensign, John [R-NV], Sen. Enzi, Michael B. [R-WY], Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC], Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA], Sen. Hagan, Kay R. [D-NC], Sen. Hoeven, John [R-ND], Sen. Hutchison, Kay Bailey [R-TX], Sen. Inhofe, James M. [R-OK], Sen. Isakson, Johnny [R-GA], Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN], Sen. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ], Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT], Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN], Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ], Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY], Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS], Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK], Sen. Nelson, Ben [D-NE], Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH], Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID], Sen. Roberts, Pat [R-KS], Sen. Snowe, Olympia J. [R-ME], Sen. Stabenow, Debbie [D-MI], Sen. Tester, Jon [D-MT], Sen. Thune, John [R-SD], Sen. Udall, Mark [D-CO], Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS], Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [R-AL], Sen. Vitter, David [R-LA]

Subjects

Defence, Taxation, Budget

Source updated

14 August 2025

Defence · Taxation · Budget

Summary

Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to repeal a provision (added by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) that extends to corporations that are not tax-exempt the requirement to report payments of $600 or more. Rescinds $39 billion of appropriated but unobligated discretionary funds. Exempts unobligated funds of the Department of Defense (DOD) or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).  Requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to determine and identify from which appropriation accounts such rescissions shall apply and report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Congress on such rescissions.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 January 2011

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 January 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 25 January 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 25 January 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 25 January 2011

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 62 sponsors and actors.

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.