PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 1864 (113th)

A bill to require a demonstration program on the accession as Air Force officers of candidates with auditory impairments.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 December 2013

Last action

19 December 2013 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text of measure as introduced: CR S9062)

Sponsors

Rep. Harkin, Tom [D-IA-5]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

5 December 2025

Defence

Summary

Requires the Secretary of the Air Force to carry out a demonstration program to assess the feasibility and advisability of permitting individuals with auditory impairments (including deafness) access as officers of the Air Force. Authorizes between 15 and 20 individuals who are deaf or have a range of other auditory impairments, who otherwise meet all essential qualifications for accession as an officer of the Air Force, and who have not previously served as officers to participate in such program. Requires selected participants to undergo the Basic Officer Training course or the Commissioned Officer Training course at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, at the election of the Secretary. Requires the Secretary to designate a special advisor to act as a resource for participants, as well as a liaison between participants and those providing the officer training.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 December 2013

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text of measure as introduced: CR S9062)

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 19 December 2013

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9061-9062)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 19 December 2013

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.