PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 198 (114th)

Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2015

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

20 January 2015

Last action

20 January 2015 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text of measure as introduced: CR S286)

Sponsors

Richard Durbin, John Reed, Sheldon Whitehouse, Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI], Sen. Franken, Al [D-MN], Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA], Rep. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA-6], Bernie Sanders, Jeff Merkley, Tammy Baldwin, Brian Schatz, Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT], Gary Peters, Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD], Edward Markey

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

10 January 2026

Taxation

Summary

Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2015 Amends the Internal Revenue Code to revise rules for the taxation of inverted corporations (i.e., U.S. corporations that acquire foreign companies to reincorporate in a foreign jurisdiction with income tax rates lower than the United States) to provide that a foreign corporation that acquires the properties of a U.S. corporation or partnership after May 8, 2014, shall be treated as an inverted corporation and thus subject to U.S. taxation if, after such acquisition: (1) it holds more than 50% of the stock of the new entity (expanded affiliated group), or (2) the management or control of the new entity occurs primarily within the United States and the new entity has significant domestic business activities.  

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 January 2015

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text of measure as introduced: CR S286)

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 20 January 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.