PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 2002 (103rd)

Rail Investment Act of 1994

Original

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 March 1994

Last action

28 September 1994 · Reported

Status

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 667.

Sponsors

Sen. Exon, J. James [D-NE]

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

14 January 2025

Transport

Summary

Amtrak Investment Act of 1994 - Amends the Rail Passenger Service Act to establish as one of the goals for the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) management of its capital investment in such a way as to provide its customers with world class service. (Sec. 4) Requires AMTRAK to include in its annual report on its operations to the President and to the Congress projections of anticipated and realized benefits of proposed and previously funded projects. (Sec. 5) Requires applications by a State, agency, or person for the institution of rail passenger service, or the retention of a route, train, or service which AMTRAK intends to discontinue, to include a statement that it agrees to pay in each year of service specified percentages of the long-term avoidable losses for each year (currently, short-term avoidable losses) of the operation of such service. Authorizes AMTRAK for each year of service to contribute specified percentages to such losses. Requires such State, agency, or person, with respect to the renewal of such service, to provide a statement that it agrees to pay at least 65 percent of the long-term avoidable losses of operating such service and at least 50 percent of the associated capital costs. Directs the Secretary of Transportation to review AMTRAK's state-assisted rail passenger services program and report the results, including recommendations for revising such program, to the Congress. (Sec. 6) Amends the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 to direct AMTRAK to make any capital improvements for the Northeast Corridor improvement project necessary for reliable, high-speed rail passenger service and enhancement of capacity for intercity and commuter passenger service. (Sec. 7) Amends the Rail Passenger Service Act to authorize appropriations for: (1) AMTRAK operating expenses; (2) State requested rail passenger service; (3) capital investment projects; (4) construction expenses to convert the James A. Farley Post Office, New York City, into a train station and commercial center and for redevelopment of the Pennsylvania Station, New York City; (5) capital expenditures for the Northeast Corridor improvement project; and (6) certain mandatory payments.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 March 1994

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 March 1994

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3984)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 March 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 13 April 1994

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Surface Transportation. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-631.

    Source: Committee

  5. 23 September 1994

    Reported

    Committee on Commerce. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    Source: Committee

  6. 28 September 1994

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 667.

    Source: Calendars

  7. 28 September 1994

    Reported

    Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

  8. 28 September 1994

    Reported

    Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.