Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 2026 (107th)

A bill to authorize the use of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for projects and activities to address proliferation threats outside the states of the former Soviet Union, and for other purposes.

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 March 2002

Last action

14 December 2002 · Introduced

Status

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S13280-13286)

Sponsors

Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN], Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM], Sen. Hagel, Chuck [R-NE], Sen. Bayh, Evan [D-IN], Sen. Nelson, Bill [D-FL], Sen. Biden, Joseph R., Jr. [D-DE], Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY]

Subjects

Defence, Taxation, Budget

Source updated

7 April 2025

Defence · Taxation · Budget

Summary

Authorizes the Secretary of Defense to expend up to $50 million for a fiscal year in Cooperative Threat Reduction funds to prevent proliferation of nuclear, chemical and other weapons outside the former Soviet Union, where allocation of such funds is currently limited to. Specifies that such expenditures may occur if determined that certain projects or activities will assist the United States in dealing with critical emerging proliferation threats or in achieving long-standing nonproliferation goals. Determines that such funds may go only to equipment, goods and services and cannot be spent directly on a project or activity. Directs the President to include in a given year's budget a request for funds distributed under the Act during the last fiscal year with a description of what projects would otherwise have been funded. Sets a time frame for the Secretary to inform Congress of what funds will be used for. Contains a provision for emergency distribution of funds to meet a critical emerging proliferation threat or a nonproliferation goal that requires such allocation. Requires the Secretary to report to Congress on the advisability of establishing one or more new cooperative threat reduction programs to account for projects or activities for which emergency distribution of funds were distributed under the Act or that were funded under the Act two years in a row.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 March 2002

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 March 2002

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2010-2011)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 18 March 2002

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 14 December 2002

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S13280-13286)

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 18 March 2002

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 18 March 2002

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 18 March 2002

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.