PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 211 (100th)

A bill to amend section 2254 of title 28, United States Code, to provide specific procedures for the consideration of writs of habeas corpus filed on behalf of individuals under a sentence of death.

Original

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

6 January 1987

Last action

9 February 1987 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Constitution.

Sponsors

Rep. Symms, Steven D. [R-ID-1]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Amends the Federal judicial code to condition the consideration of writs of habeas corpus filed on behalf of individuals in custody under a State sentence of death upon a credible showing of innocence by affidavit or other instrument taken upon oath or affirmation. Specifies exceptions to such condition where the State: (1) does not provide by law for a right to appeal convictions resulting in death sentences and appellate review of death sentences; or (2) provides for such review but does not provide a procedure for collateral review of State proceedings resulting in death sentences. Limits stays of execution granted for the purpose of making possible such required showing to 60 days (unless the applicant shows that a credible showing of innocence can be made but not within the time allotted).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 January 1987

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 6 January 1987

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 9 February 1987

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Constitution.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.