Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 2838 (115th)

Using Data to Prevent Opioid Diversion Act of 2018

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

15 May 2018

Last action

19 June 2018 · Reported

Status

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 476.

Sponsors

Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA], Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA], Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Sen. Manchin, Joe, III [D-WV]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Using Data to Prevent Opioid Diversion Act of 2018 This bill establishes a new requirement intended to help drug manufacturers and distributors identify and prevent suspicious orders of opioids and reduce rates of diversion. Specifically, the Drug Enforcement Administration must to use its automated data system—the Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System—to inform drug manufacturers and distributors about the quantity and type of opioids that are distributed to pharmacies and practitioners.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 May 2018

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 15 May 2018

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2680-2681)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 24 May 2018

    Reported

    Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

    Source: Committee

  4. 19 June 2018

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 476.

    Source: Calendars

  5. 19 June 2018

    Reported

    Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

  6. 19 June 2018

    Reported

    Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

5 official files

Reported to Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to Senate (text)

    Reported to Senate · EN · 19 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Reported to Senate (PDF)

    Reported to Senate · EN · 19 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 15 May 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 15 May 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 15 May 2018

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.