PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 379 (101st)

A bill to amend titles 18 and 29 of the United States Code, to eliminate, and establish an alternative to the exclusionary rule in Federal criminal proceedings.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

8 February 1989

Last action

24 February 1989 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Constitution.

Sponsors

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Amends the Federal criminal code to provide that evidence shall not be excluded from a criminal proceeding because it was obtained in violation of the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution. Makes the United States liable for damages resulting from a search or seizure conducted by a law enforcement officer acting within the scope of employment in violation of the fourth amendment. Permits recovery of actual and punitive damages not exceeding $25,000. Authorizes the court to award reasonable attorney fees. Limits recovery of a person convicted of an offense for which evidence was illegally seized to actual physical personal injury and property damages. Makes such remedy the exclusive civil remedy for a violation of the fourth amendment to the Constitution. Authorizes a Federal agency to discipline an officer who conducts an illegal search or seizure upon a determination, after notice and hearing, that the officer lacked a good faith belief that the search or seizure was constitutional.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 8 February 1989

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 8 February 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 24 February 1989

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Constitution.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.