PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 486 (104th)

Reorganization of the Federal Administrative Judiciary Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 March 1995

Last action

2 March 1995 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sen. Heflin, Howell [D-AL], Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA], Sen. Ford, Wendell H. [D-KY], Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC], Sen. Bumpers, Dale [D-AR], Rep. Brown, Hank [R-CO-4], Rep. Simon, Paul [D-IL-24], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [D-AL], Sen. Moseley-Braun, Carol [D-IL], Rep. Cohen, William S. [R-ME-2]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Reorganization of the Federal Administrative Judiciary Act - Amends Federal civil service law to reorganize all administrative law judges into an independent Administrative Law Judge Corps, headed by a chief administrative law judge appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, with each judge of the Corps assigned to a division depending upon the areas of specialization in which the judge has served. Provides for the payment of judges' salaries out of existing fees charged by agencies for such purpose. Requires the chief administrative law judge to conduct a study of the various types and levels of agency review to which decisions of administrative law judges are subject for a report to the President and the Congress. Authorizes appropriations.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 March 1995

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 2 March 1995

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3395-3396)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 March 1995

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.