PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 679 (96th)

Jurisdictional Amendments Act of 1979

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

15 March 1979

Last action

Status

Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Jurisdictional Amendments Act of 1979 - Abolishes the amount in controversy requirement in Federal question cases. Authorizes a district court, in suits for damages brought under the Consumer Product Safety Act in which the plaintiff is adjudged to recover less than $10,000, to deny or to impose costs on such plaintiff. Abolishes diversity of citizenship as a basis of jurisdiction of Federal district courts, but retains as a basis of jurisdiction "alienage," involving foreign states or citizens of foreign states. Increases the amount in controversy requirement in such cases from $10,000 to $25,000. Retains as a basis for Federal jurisdiction statutory interpleader, which includes actions between citizens of different States. Permits venue for a Federal civil action in any judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or in which a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated. Provides that a civil action brought in a State court of which the Federal district courts have original jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship may be removed to the Federal court only by a party in interest joined and served as a defendent who is a citizen or subject of a foreign state.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.