PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 682 (100th)

Legal Services Corporation Amendments Act of 1987

Original

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

6 March 1987

Last action

13 March 1987 · Committee

Status

Committee on Labor and Human Resources requested executive comment from Legal Services Corporation.

Sponsors

Sen. Roth Jr., William V. [R-DE], Sen. Trible, Paul S., Jr. [R-VA]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 August 2025

Summary

Legal Services Corporation Amendments Act of 1987 - Amends the Legal Services Corporation Act to allow a court to award reasonable costs and legal fees to a prevailing defendant (in an action commenced by the Legal Services Corporation or a recipient of Corporation assistance) where: (1) the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation; (2) the action was pursued to harass the defendant; or (3) the corporation or recipient maliciously abused legal process. Provides that any such costs and fees shall be paid by the Corporation, by the recipient, or by the attorney, as determined by the Court. (Current law provides for: (1) the awarding of such costs and fees only where the action was pursued to harass the defendant or where the Corporation or recipient abused legal process; and (2) the payment of such costs and fees by the Corporation.)

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 March 1987

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 6 March 1987

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 13 March 1987

    Committee

    Committee on Labor and Human Resources requested executive comment from Legal Services Corporation.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.