Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 819 (98th)

A bill to amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to provide consecutive sentencing for felonies committed while on bail for another offense.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

16 March 1983

Last action

21 March 1983 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Criminal Law.

Sponsors

Sen. Bentsen, Lloyd M. [D-TX], Sen. Boren, David L. [D-OK], Sen. Chiles, Lawton [D-FL], Sen. DeConcini, Dennis [D-AZ], Sen. East, John P. [R-NC], Sen. Garn, E. J. (Jake) [R-UT], Sen. Hawkins, Paula [R-FL], Sen. Heflin, Howell [D-AL], Sen. Johnston, J. Bennett [D-LA], Sen. Long, Russell B. [D-LA], Sen. Nunn, Sam [D-GA], Sen. Pell, Claiborne [D-RI], Sen. Sasser, Jim [D-TN], Sen. Zorinsky, Edward [D-NE]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Amends the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to require a court to impose consecutive sentences on any defendant who commits and is convicted of a felony while on bail or release on personal recognizance for another offense and was also convicted of the original offense.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 March 1983

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 16 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 21 March 1983

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Criminal Law.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.