PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 833 (101st)

Cable Television Subscriber Protection Act of 1989

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 April 1989

Last action

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 August 2025

Summary

Cable Television Subscriber Protection Act of 1989 - Amends the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 to provide that a franchising authority shall be authorized to regulate the rates for the provision of basic cable service and for installing or renting cable receiving equipment if it finds that a cable system is not subject to effective competition. Presumes such effective competition if the cable community is served by more than one multichannel video programming distributor. Finds that a cable community shall be considered to be served by more than one multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) if comparable video programming is available to at least 67 percent of the multichannel households from a competing MVPD and the number of households subscribing to programming services offered by such competing MVPD or combinations of MVPDs exceeds 30 percent of the multichannel households in the community. Requires MVPDs to be completely independent of one another in order to be included as competing MVPDs in the determination of the presence of effective competition. Presumes a cable system to be subject to effective competition if less than 30 percent of the households to which cable service is available subscribe to such service. Requires a franchising authority authorized to regulate basic cable rates under such Act to periodically review its effective competition findings in order to assure such effective competition. Allows a cable operator who has been adversely affected by a finding by a franchising authority determining a lack of effective competition to seek judicial review according to procedures defined under such Act. Allows a court to set aside such a finding by a franchising authority if the cable operator demonstrates that the finding is not supported by substantial evidence. Requires the franchising authority to establish a method for such regulation.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.