PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 924 (100th)

Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Services Block Grant Amendments of 1987

Original

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

6 April 1987

Last action

10 April 1987 · Referred

Status

Committee on Labor and Human Resources requested executive comment from Health and Human Services Department, OMB.

Sponsors

Sen. Bentsen, Lloyd M. [D-TX], Sen. Proxmire, William [D-WI], Rep. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA-3], Sen. Stennis, John C. [D-MS], Sen. Karnes, David K. [R-NE], Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND], Sen. Durenberger, Dave [R-MN], Rep. Breaux, John B. [D-LA-7], Sen. Sanford, Terry [D-NC], Rep. Cochran, Thad [R-MS-4], Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC], Sen. Hollings, Ernest F. [D-SC], Sen. Trible, Paul S., Jr. [R-VA], Rep. Harkin, Tom [D-IA-5], Sen. Wilson, Pete [R-CA], Sen. Cranston, Alan [D-CA]

Subjects

Healthcare

Source updated

28 August 2025

Healthcare

Summary

Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Services Block Grant Amendments of 1987 - Amends title XIX (Block Grants) of the Public Health Services Act to authorize appropriations for block grants for alcohol and drug abuse and mental health services for FY 1988 through 1992. Revises the formula for allotment of such block grants to States and territories and possessions of the United States.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 April 1987

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 6 April 1987

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 10 April 1987

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Children, Family, Drugs, Alcohol.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.