Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Law · HJRES

H.J.Res. 67 (115th)

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by qualified State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

enactedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

7 February 2017

Last action

13 April 2017 · President

Status

Became Public Law No: 115-24.

Sponsors

Rep. Rooney, Francis [R-FL-19], Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5], Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5], Rep. Roe, David P. [R-TN-1], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Messer, Luke [R-IN-6], Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Rep. Mitchell, Paul [R-MI-10]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 December 2025

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees. (The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 February 2017

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 7 February 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 7 February 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 13 February 2017

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 116 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 66 and H.J. Res. 67. Each joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in each joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each joint resolution without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.

    Source: Floor

  5. 14 February 2017

    Passed

    Rule H. Res. 116 passed House.

    Source: Floor

  6. 15 February 2017

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 15 February 2017

    Vote

    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 191 (Roll no. 95). (text: CR H1218)

    Source: Floor

  8. 15 February 2017

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 191 (Roll no. 95).(text: CR H1218)

    Source: Floor

  9. 15 February 2017

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 116. (consideration: CR H1218-1221))

    Source: Floor

  10. 15 February 2017

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 66 and H.J. Res. 67. Each joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in each joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each joint resolution without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.

    Source: Floor

  11. 15 February 2017

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    Source: Floor

  12. 16 February 2017

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate, read twice.

    Source: IntroReferral

  13. 29 March 2017

    Passed

    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2055)

    Source: Floor

  14. 30 March 2017

    Floor

    Considered by Senate.

    Source: Floor

  15. 30 March 2017

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 49. Record Vote Number: 99.(consideration: CR S2121-2122)

    Source: Floor

  16. 5 April 2017

    Floor

    Presented to President.

    Source: Floor

  17. 5 April 2017

    President

    Presented to President.

    Source: President

  18. 13 April 2017

    Became law

    Became Public Law No: 115-24.

    Source: President

  19. 13 April 2017

    Became law

    Signed by President.

    Source: BecameLaw

  20. 13 April 2017

    President

    Signed by President.

    Source: President

Votes

30 March 2017 · Joint Resolution Passed · On the Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 67 · Joint Resolution Passed · Official source

Yes 50 · No 49 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 1

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

15 February 2017 · passed · On Passage · Passed · Official source

Yes 234 · No 191 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 6

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

14 official files

Enrolled Bill (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Enrolled Bill (text)

    Enrolled Bill · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Enrolled Bill (PDF)

    Enrolled Bill · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law (text)

    Public Law · EN · 13 April 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law (PDF)

    Public Law · EN · 13 April 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law

    summary · EN · 13 April 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed Senate without amendment

    summary · EN · 30 March 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Received in Senate (text)

    Received in Senate · EN · 16 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Received in Senate (PDF)

    Received in Senate · EN · 16 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 15 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 15 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House without amendment

    summary · EN · 15 February 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 7 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 7 February 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 7 February 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Related across the Repo ecosystem

Direct relationships are identifier-backed. Topic context means shared TopicMembership — not a citation and not causation.

Direct relationships

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.