Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Law · HR

H.R. 1 (108th)

Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003

enactedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 June 2003

Last action

18 November 2003 · Floor

Status

Became Public Law No: 108-173.

Sponsors

Rep. Hastert, J. Dennis [R-IL-14], Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22], Sen. Blunt, Roy [R-MO], Rep. Pryce, Deborah [R-OH-15], Rep. Thomas, William M. [R-CA-21], Rep. Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [R-LA-3], Rep. Johnson, Nancy L. [R-CT-5], Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R-FL-9], Rep. Peterson, Collin C. [D-MN-7], Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV], Rep. Brown-Waite, Ginny [R-FL-5], Rep. Bradley, Jeb [R-NH-1], Rep. Burns, Max [R-GA-12], Rep. Dunn, Jennifer [R-WA-8], Rep. Fletcher, Ernie [R-KY-6], Rep. Goss, Porter J. [R-FL-14], Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6], Rep. McCrery, Jim [R-LA-4], Rep. Nunes, Devin [R-CA-22], Rep. Simmons, Rob [R-CT-2], Rep. Sullivan, John [R-OK-1]

Subjects

Healthcare, Education

Source updated

7 April 2025

Healthcare · Education

Summary

Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act of 2003 - Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSA) to add a new part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program) under which each individual who is entitled to benefits under Medicare part A (Hospital Insurance) or enrolled under Medicare part B (Supplemental Medical Insurance) is entitled to obtain qualified prescription drug coverage. Authorizes the individual to elect to enroll: (1) in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan (replacing the current Medicare+Choice plans under Medicare part C (Medicare+Choice)); (2) in an enhanced fee-for-service (EFFS) plan; or (3) in a prescription drug plan (PDP) if the individual is not enrolled in an MA-EFFS plan (a Medicare Advantage plan and an EFFS plan). Establishes a Medicare Prescription Drug Trust Fund. Outlines standard coverage benefit packages for FY 2006. Includes for the standard package an annual deductible of $250, and requires insurers to cover 80 percent of enrollees drug costs up to the initial coverage limit of $2,000. Requires enrollees to cover all costs between $2,001 and $3,500, and Medicare to cover the entire cost once the beneficiary has reached the $3,500 catastrophic out-of-pocket threshold. Prescribes a formula for adjustment of: (1) such deductible and annual limits for inflation; and (2) such catastrophic limit for each enrollee in a PDP or in an MA-EFFS Rx plan (an MA-EFFS plan which provides qualified prescription drug coverage) whose adjusted gross income exceeds $60,000. Establishes a competitive bidding process for negotiating the terms and conditions of PDP sponsors. Provides for full premium subsidy and reduction of cost-sharing for individuals with incomes below 135 percent of the Federal poverty level. Contains subsidy payments for qualifying entities to promote the participation of PDP and MA-EFFS Rx plan sponsors. Sets out: (1) a new Medicare prescription drug discount card and assistance program under the Medicare program; and (2) requirements for combating waste, fraud, and abuse under Medicare. Makes a number of other changes with regard to Medicare: (1) part A concerning rural health care, inpatient hospital services, skilled nursing facility services, and hospices; (2) part B concerning physicians services and other services; and (3) part A and B concerning home health services, direct graduate medical education, and voluntary chronic care improvement. Establishes the Medicare Benefits Administration in the Department of Health and Human Services. Amends SSA title XVIII part F (Miscellaneous) (currently part D) to include a number of regulatory, contracting, and administrative changes, such as the: (1) coordination of educational funding; (2) transfer of responsibility for Medicare appeals; (3) provision of expedited access to judicial review of Medicare appeals; (4) recovery of overpayments; and (5) revision of reassignment provisions. Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) with regard to: (1) the 30-month of Food and Drug Administration approval for any new drug in certain circumstances; and (2) forfeiture of the 180-day marketing exclusivity period by the first new drug applicant to a subsequent applicant. Provides for manufacture, marketing, or sale agreements between a generic drug applicant and a brand name drug applicant, subject to Federal Trade Commission review. Amends the FFDCA to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate regulations permitting pharmacists, wholesalers, and individuals to import prescription drugs from Canada into the United States, subject to specified conditions.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 June 2003

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 June 2003

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 June 2003

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

    Source: Committee

  4. 25 June 2003

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 25 June 2003

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 26 June 2003

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1 and H.R. 2596 with 3 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. Amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Mr. Rangel is debatable for one hour. H.R. 2596 shall be considered in the House and after final adoption, shall be appended to the text of H.R. 1. H.R. 2596 will then be laid on the table. Concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment of the House and Senate in July shall be in order for consideration. Finally, the Committee on Appropriations shall have until midnight on Thursday, July 3, 2003 to file a report making appropriations for

    Source: Floor

  7. 26 June 2003

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 299. (consideration: CR H6007-6105, H6107-6256; text of measure as introduced: CR H6007-6077)

    Source: Floor

  8. 26 June 2003

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 299 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1 and H.R. 2596 with 3 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. Amendment in the nature of a substitute by, and if offered by, Mr. Rangel is debatable for one hour. H.R. 2596 shall be considered in the House and after final adoption, shall be appended to the text of H.R. 1. H.R. 2596 will then be laid on the table. Concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment of the House and Senate in July shall be in order for consideration. Finally, the Committee on Appropriations shall have until midnight on Thursday, July 3, 2003 to file a report making appropriations for

    Source: Floor

  9. 27 June 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 27 June 2003

    Vote

    On passage Passed by recorded vote: 216 - 215, 1 Present (Roll no. 332).

    Source: Floor

  11. 27 June 2003

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 216 - 215, 1 Present (Roll no. 332).

    Source: Floor

  12. 27 June 2003

    Vote

    On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 208 - 223 (Roll no. 331). (text: CR 6/26/2003 H6181-6254)

    Source: Floor

  13. 27 June 2003

    Floor

    The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  14. 27 June 2003

    Floor

    Mr. Thompson (CA) moved to recommit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR 6/26/2003 H6181-6255)

    Source: Floor

  15. 27 June 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House continued with the balance of the debate on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  16. 7 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Senate insists on its amendments, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Grassley; Hatch; Nickles; Frist; Kyl; Baucus; Rockefeller; Daschle; Breaux.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  17. 7 July 2003

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S.1 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S8898-8997)

    Source: Floor

  18. 7 July 2003

    Floor

    Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8898-8997)

    Source: Floor

  19. 7 July 2003

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate.

    Source: IntroReferral

  20. 8 July 2003

    Floor

    Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    Source: Floor

  21. 14 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The Speaker appointed conferees for consideration of the House bill and the Senate amendments, and modifications committed to conference: Tauzin, Thomas, Bilirakis, Johnson (CT), DeLay, Dingell, Rangel, and Berry.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  22. 14 July 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  23. 14 July 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Davis (TN) motion to instruct conferees.

    Source: Floor

  24. 14 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  25. 14 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The motion instructs conferees to (1) reject the provisions of subtitle C of title II of the House bill and; (2) that the House recede to the Senate on the provisions to guarantee access to prescription drug coverage under section1860D-13(e) of the Social Security Act, as added by section 101(a) of the Senate amendment.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  26. 14 July 2003

    Passed

    On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6658-6666, H6680-6681)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  27. 14 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Davis (TN) moved that the House instruct conferees.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  28. 14 July 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Tauzin asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  29. 9 September 2003

    Floor

    NOTICE OF MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES - Mr. Michaud of Maine notified the House of his intention to offer a motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  30. 10 September 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  31. 10 September 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 189 - 220 (Roll no. 502). (consideration: CR 9/11/2003 H8182-8189, H8190-8191; text: CR 9/11/2003 H8182)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  32. 10 September 2003

    Floor

    The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Michaud motion to instruct conferees which was noticed in the Congressional Record on Tuesday, September 9, 2003.

    Source: Floor

  33. 10 September 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Michaud moved that the House instruct conferees.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  34. 16 September 2003

    Floor

    NOTICE MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES - Mr. Stenholm notified the House of his intention to offer a motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  35. 17 September 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Stenholm motion to instruct conferees which was noticed in the Congressional Record on Tuesday, September 16, 2003.

    Source: Floor

  36. 17 September 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Stenholm moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H8361-8366; text: CR H8361)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  37. 23 September 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  38. 23 September 2003

    Floor

    NOTICE OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO INSTRUCT - Mr. Kind notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  39. 23 September 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 202 - 213 (Roll no. 510). (consideration: CR H8465-8466)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  40. 24 September 2003

    Floor

    NOTICE OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO INSTRUCT - Mr. Sandlin notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  41. 24 September 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Kind moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H8880-8887; text: CR H8880)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  42. 25 September 2003

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  43. 25 September 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Sandlin motion to instruct conferees.

    Source: Floor

  44. 25 September 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Sandlin moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H8925-8930; text: CR H8925)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  45. 25 September 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  46. 25 September 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 199 - 220 (Roll no. 522).

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  47. 30 September 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  48. 30 September 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 202 - 205 (Roll no. 524). (consideration: CR H8989-8990)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  49. 1 October 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 215 (Roll no. 528). (consideration: CR H9072)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  50. 1 October 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  51. 1 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  52. 1 October 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Case motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  53. 1 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Case moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H9062-9067; text: CR H9062)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  54. 2 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  55. 2 October 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Bishop (NY) motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  56. 2 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Bishop (NY) moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H9171-9187; text: CR H9171)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  57. 7 October 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  58. 7 October 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 181 - 214 (Roll no. 533). (consideration: CR H9249)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  59. 8 October 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Schakowsky motion to instruct conferees which was noticed in the Congressional Record on Tuesday, October 7, 2003.

    Source: Floor

  60. 8 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  61. 8 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Ms. Schakowsky moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H9349-9354; text: CR H9349)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  62. 15 October 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  63. 15 October 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 190 - 218 (Roll no. 542). (consideration: CR H9441-9442)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  64. 21 October 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Brown (OH) motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  65. 21 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Brown (OH) moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H9780-9784)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  66. 28 October 2003

    Vote

    On motion to instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 194 - 209 (Roll no. 573). (consideration: CR H9967)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  67. 29 October 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Davis (FL) motion to instruct conferees.

    Source: Floor

  68. 29 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  69. 29 October 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Davis (FL) moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H10106-10112; text: CR H10106)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  70. 30 October 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  71. 30 October 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 195 - 217 (Roll no. 599). (consideration: CR 10/31/2003 H10210-10211)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  72. 5 November 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Capps motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

  73. 5 November 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  74. 5 November 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mrs. Capps moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H10438-10443; text: CR H10438)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  75. 6 November 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Cardoza motion to instruct conferees.

    Source: Floor

  76. 6 November 2003

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Cardoza moved that the House instruct conferees. (consideration: CR H10528-10534; text: CR H10528)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  77. 6 November 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 197 - 209 (Roll no. 615). (consideration: CR H10512)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  78. 7 November 2003

    Vote

    On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 184 - 207 (Roll no. 619). (consideration: CR H11009-11010)

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  79. 7 November 2003

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  80. 18 November 2003

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Berkley motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 1.

    Source: Floor

Showing 80 of 119 timeline events.

Votes

25 November 2003 · Conference Report Agreed to · On the Conference Report H.R. 1 · Conference Report Agreed to · Official source

Yes 54 · No 44 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 2

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

24 November 2003 · Cloture Motion Agreed to · On the Cloture Motion H.R. 1 · Cloture Motion Agreed to · Official source

Yes 70 · No 29 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 1

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

15 official files

Enrolled Bill (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Enrolled Bill (text)

    Enrolled Bill · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Enrolled Bill (PDF)

    Enrolled Bill · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law (text)

    Public Law · EN · 8 December 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law (PDF)

    Public Law · EN · 8 December 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Public Law

    summary · EN · 8 December 2003

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Conference report filed in House

    summary · EN · 21 November 2003

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed Amendment Senate (text)

    Engrossed Amendment Senate · EN · 7 July 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed Amendment Senate (PDF)

    Engrossed Amendment Senate · EN · 7 July 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Received in Senate (text)

    Received in Senate · EN · 7 July 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Received in Senate (PDF)

    Received in Senate · EN · 7 July 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 27 June 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 27 June 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 June 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 June 2003

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 25 June 2003

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Showing 10 of 11 related records.

Related across the Repo ecosystem

Direct relationships are identifier-backed. Topic context means shared TopicMembership — not a citation and not causation.

Direct relationships

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.