Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HCONRES

H.Con.Res. 243 (96th)

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should call for a United Nation's inquiry into Iranian violations of human rights and international law, should any of the American Hostages be brought to trial.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

22 January 1980

Last action

22 January 1980 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Sponsors

Rep. Fish, Hamilton, Jr. [R-NY-19], Rep. Frenzel, Bill [R-MN-3], Rep. Horton, Frank J. [R-NY-29], Rep. Pepper, Claude [D-FL-18], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Vento, Bruce F. [D-MN-4], Rep. Waxman, Henry A. [D-CA-33], Rep. Winn, Larry, Jr. [R-KS-3], Rep. Fenwick, Millicent H. [R-NJ-5], Rep. Martin, James G. [R-NC-9]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Expresses the sense of the Congress that the President should call upon the U.N. Secretary General to direct the Commission on Human Rights to convene an international inquiry committee, if the American hostages in Iran are brought to trial.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 January 1980

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 22 January 1980

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 22 January 1980

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.