Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 January 2013

Last action

25 January 2013 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution And Civil Justice.

Summary

Expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo because the decision failed to recognize: (1) that the unlimited spending of large amounts of money on elections has a corrosive effect on the electoral process not simply because of direct transactions between those who give large amounts of money and candidates and elected officials but because the presence of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process on a more fundamental level; and (2) other legitimate state interests which justify limiting money in campaigns, including the need to preserve the integrity of our republican form of government, restore public confidence in government, and ensure all citizens a more equal opportunity to participate in the political process.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

4 January 2013
Introduced
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
4 January 2013
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
4 January 2013
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
25 January 2013
Referred
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution And Civil Justice.
Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Introduced in House · 4 January 2013 · Download file

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View file Download file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Vertaal naar

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN · 4 January 2013
View Download Open at official source
Introduced in House (PDF)
Introduced in House · EN · 4 January 2013
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 4 January 2013
Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/6
Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/113/hconres/6
us · 113-hconres-6 · source updated 15 November 2019