Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 108 (101st)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1231) to direct the President to establish an emergency board to investigate and report respecting the dispute between Eastern Airlines and its collective bargaining units.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 March 1989

Last action

15 March 1989 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Pepper, Claude [D-FL-18]

Subjects

Aviation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Aviation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 1231 (Eastern Airlines labor dispute).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 March 1989

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 3.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 14 March 1989

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1231 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with the provisions of clause 2 (l)(6) of rule XI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended be the Committee on Public Works and Transportation shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five minute rule. Consideration of amendments made in order shall be limited to three hours. Measure will be read by section. Specified amendments are in order. No amendments are in order except amendments adding new sections.

    Source: Floor

  3. 14 March 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-6, by Mr. Pepper.

    Source: Committee

  4. 14 March 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-6, by Mr. Pepper.

    Source: Committee

  5. 14 March 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 15 March 1989

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

  7. 15 March 1989

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  8. 15 March 1989

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 254 - 159 (Roll no. 7).

    Source: Floor

  9. 15 March 1989

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 254 - 159 (Roll no. 7).

    Source: Floor

  10. 15 March 1989

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  11. 15 March 1989

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 14 March 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.