Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 1203 (111th)

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 3590) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4872) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

20 March 2010

Last action

21 March 2010 · Reported

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25]

Subjects

Defence, Taxation, Budget

Source updated

7 April 2025

Defence · Taxation · Budget

Summary

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 3590) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4872) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 March 2010

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 21 March 2010

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  3. 21 March 2010

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 206 (Roll no. 163). (text: CR H1824-1825)

    Source: Floor

  4. 21 March 2010

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 206 (Roll no. 163).(text: CR H1824-1825)

    Source: Floor

  5. 21 March 2010

    Vote

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by recorded vote: 228 - 202 (Roll no. 162). (consideration: CR H1852-1853)

    Source: Floor

  6. 21 March 2010

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1824-1851)

    Source: Floor

  7. 21 March 2010

    Vote

    Will the House now consider the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - 195 (Roll no. 159). (consideration: CR S1828)

    Source: Floor

  8. 21 March 2010

    Floor

    By direction of the Committee on Rules, Ms. Slaughter called up H.Res. 1203 and asked for its immediate consideration.

    Source: Floor

  9. 21 March 2010

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 178.

    Source: Calendars

  10. 21 March 2010

    Floor

    Also, upon adoption of this resolution, it shall be in order to debate topics addressed by the Senate amendments to H.R. 3590. After debate, it shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table, with the Senate amendments thereto, a single motion offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendments to H.R. 3590. If the motion is adopted, it shall be in order to consider H.R. 4872. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, modified by the amendment printed in Part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, shall be considered as adopted.

    Source: Floor

  11. 21 March 2010

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-448, by Ms. Slaughter.

    Source: Committee

  12. 21 March 2010

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-448, by Ms. Slaughter.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 21 March 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 21 March 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 21 March 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 21 March 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House without amendment

    summary · EN · 21 March 2010

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 20 March 2010

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.