Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 143 (98th)

A resolution expressing the sense of the House respecting the use of herbicides for the eradication of marijuana in Colombia.

reportedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

17 March 1983

Last action

2 August 1983 · Committee

Status

Ordered to be Reported.

Sponsors

Rep. Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. [R-FL-22], Rep. Fascell, Dante B. [D-FL-19]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 January 2025

Summary

Provides that the United States should persuade Colombia to use herbicides to eradicate marihuana in Colombia.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 March 1983

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 17 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 17 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 24 March 1983

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs.

    Source: Committee

  5. 10 June 1983

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from State, Justice.

    Source: Committee

  6. 2 August 1983

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported.

    Source: Committee

  7. 2 August 1983

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  8. 2 August 1983

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs Discharged.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.