Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 236 (101st)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1659) to improve aviation security by requiring the installation and use of certain explosive detection equipment at certain airports located outside the United States and by providing assistance for the acquisition of such equipment, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

7 September 1989

Last action

20 September 1989 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25]

Subjects

Aviation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Aviation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 1659 (aviation security).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 September 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-230, by Ms. Slaughter (NY).

    Source: Committee

  2. 7 September 1989

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 54.

    Source: Calendars

  3. 7 September 1989

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1659 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation now printed in italics in the bill, as modified by the amendment recommended by the Committee on Foreign Affairs now printed in boldface roman in the bill, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. Measure will be read by title. Bill is open to amendments.

    Source: Floor

  4. 7 September 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-230, by Ms. Slaughter (NY).

    Source: Committee

  5. 7 September 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 20 September 1989

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 20 September 1989

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 416 - 0 (Roll no. 236).

    Source: Floor

  8. 20 September 1989

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 416 - 0 (Roll no. 236).

    Source: Floor

  9. 20 September 1989

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 20 September 1989

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  11. 20 September 1989

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 7 September 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.