PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 252 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2950) to develop a national intermodal surface transportation system, to authorize funds for construction of highways, for highway safety programs, and for mass transit programs, and for other purposes.

Original

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

22 October 1991

Last action

23 October 1991 · Floor

Status

On motion to table the motion to reconsider agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 319 - 89 (Roll no. 333).

Sponsors

Rep. Wheat, Alan [D-MO-5]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2950 (transportation programs).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 October 1991

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 64.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 22 October 1991

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2950 with 2 hours and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of the bill H.R. 3566, as modified by the amendment printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. All points of order against said substitute, as modified, are waived. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. It shall be in order at any time for the chairman of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation to offer amendments e...

    Source: Floor

  3. 22 October 1991

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-265, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  4. 22 October 1991

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-265, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  5. 22 October 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 23 October 1991

    Vote

    On motion to table the motion to reconsider agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 319 - 89 (Roll no. 333).

    Source: Floor

  7. 23 October 1991

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Moakley moved to table the motion to reconsider agreeing to the resolution

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  8. 23 October 1991

    Floor

    Mr. Wheat moved to reconsider agreeing to the resolution.

    Source: Floor

  9. 23 October 1991

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 323 - 102 (Roll no. 332).

    Source: Floor

  10. 23 October 1991

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 323 - 102 (Roll no. 332).

    Source: Floor

  11. 23 October 1991

    Vote

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 319 - 104 (Roll no. 331).

    Source: Floor

  12. 23 October 1991

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  13. 23 October 1991

    Floor

    Point of order raised by Mr. DeLay on the content of the measure. Mr. Delay stated that certain amendments contained in the provisions of the rule were not submitted within the time constraints announced by the Rules Committee and because such amendments are being made in order for consideration, a point of order lies against H. Res. 252. Point of order overruled by the Chair.

    Source: Floor

  14. 23 October 1991

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.