Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 254 (101st)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2748) to authorize appropriations for the fiscal year 1990 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, for the Intelligence Community Staff, for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 October 1989

Last action

12 October 1989 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Moakley, John Joseph [D-MA-9]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Taxation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2748 (intelligence services funding).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 October 1989

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 61.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 3 October 1989

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2748 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. All points of order against the bill for failure to comply with the provisions of sections 302(c) and 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as amended, and with the provisions of clause 5(a) of rule XXI are waived. Measure will be read by title. Bill is open to amendments. The amendments printed in section two of this resolution shall be considered as having been adopted and shall become original text for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute rule.

    Source: Floor

  3. 3 October 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-266, by Mr. Moakley.

    Source: Committee

  4. 3 October 1989

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-266, by Mr. Moakley.

    Source: Committee

  5. 3 October 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 12 October 1989

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 12 October 1989

    Passed

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  8. 12 October 1989

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  9. 12 October 1989

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 12 October 1989

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  11. 12 October 1989

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 3 October 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.