Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 278 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2130) to authorize appropriations for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for fiscal year 1992.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

13 November 1991

Last action

20 November 1991 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Wheat, Alan [D-MO-5]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Taxation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2130 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funding).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 November 1991

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 74.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 13 November 1991

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-313, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  3. 13 November 1991

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-313, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  4. 13 November 1991

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2130 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 3704, as modified by the amendments printed in section 2 of this resolution, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment to said substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Said amendments shall be considered in the order and manner specified. All points of order against said amendments are waived.

    Source: Floor

  5. 13 November 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 20 November 1991

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 20 November 1991

    Passed

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  8. 20 November 1991

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  9. 20 November 1991

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 20 November 1991

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  11. 20 November 1991

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 13 November 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.