Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 403 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3553) to amend and extend the Higher Education Act of 1965.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

20 March 1992

Last action

25 March 1992 · Passed

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Gordon, Bart [D-TN-6]

Subjects

Education

Source updated

7 February 2024

Education

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 3553 (higher education).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 March 1992

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 20 March 1992

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 114.

    Source: Calendars

  3. 20 March 1992

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3553 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendment now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 4471, as modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. All points of order against said substitute, as modified, are waived. Measure will be read by title. Specified amendments are in order. After passage of H.R. 3553, it shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill S. 1150 and consider said bill in the House. It shall then be in order to move to strike out all after the enacting clause of said Sena...

    Source: Floor

  4. 20 March 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-462, by Mr. Gordon.

    Source: Committee

  5. 20 March 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-462, by Mr. Gordon.

    Source: Committee

  6. 25 March 1992

    Passed

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  7. 25 March 1992

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  8. 25 March 1992

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  9. 25 March 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  10. 25 March 1992

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

  11. 25 March 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 20 March 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.