Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 461 (104th)

Regarding U.S. concerns with human rights abuse, nuclear and chemical weapons proliferation, illegal weapons trading, military intimidation of Taiwan, and trade violations by the People's Republic of China and the People's Liberation Army, and directing the committees of jurisdiction to commence hearings and report appropriate legislation.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 June 1996

Last action

27 June 1996 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-48], Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22], Rep. Gingrich, Newt [R-GA-6], Rep. Armey, Richard K. [R-TX-26], Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22], Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6], Rep. Boehner, John A. [R-OH-8], Rep. Gilman, Benjamin A. [R-NY-20], Rep. Royce, Edward R. [R-CA-39], Rep. Spence, Floyd [R-SC-2]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

7 April 2025

Defence

Summary

Directs specified congressional committees to hold hearings on U.S. concerns with respect to human rights abuses, proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons, and unfair trade practices by China. Urges that legislation addressing these matters be reported by September 30, 1996.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 June 1996

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 461 and H.J. Res. 182. Providing for the consideration in the House of H.J. Res. 182 with two hours of general debate. All points of order against the joint resolution and against its consideration shall be waived. Pursuant to secs. 152 and 153 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motion. Secs. 152 and 153 of the Trade Act shall not apply to any other joint resolution disapproving the extension of most-favored-nation treatment to the People's Republic of China for the remainder of the 104th Congress. After disposition of the joint resolution, it shall be in order to consider in the House H. Res. 461, debatable for one hour. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution.

    Source: Floor

  2. 25 June 1996

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 June 1996

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 25 June 1996

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 27 June 1996

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  6. 27 June 1996

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 411 - 7, 3 Present (Roll no. 285).

    Source: Floor

  7. 27 June 1996

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 411 - 7, 3 Present (Roll no. 285).

    Source: Floor

  8. 27 June 1996

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    Source: Floor

  9. 27 June 1996

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 461 and H.J. Res. 182. Providing for the consideration in the House of H.J. Res. 182 with two hours of general debate. All points of order against the joint resolution and against its consideration shall be waived. Pursuant to secs. 152 and 153 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motion. Secs. 152 and 153 of the Trade Act shall not apply to any other joint resolution disapproving the extension of most-favored-nation treatment to the People's Republic of China for the remainder of the 104th Congress. After disposition of the joint resolution, it shall be in order to consider in the House H. Res. 461, debatable for one hour. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution.

    Source: Floor

  10. 27 June 1996

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 463. (consideration: CR H7027-7040)

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

5 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 27 June 1996

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 27 June 1996

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 June 1996

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 June 1996

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 25 June 1996

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.