Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 473 (101st)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 5269) to control crime.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

24 September 1990

Last action

25 September 1990 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 5269 (crime control).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 September 1990

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 159.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 24 September 1990

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-752, by Ms. Slaughter (NY).

    Source: Committee

  3. 24 September 1990

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-752, by Ms. Slaughter (NY).

    Source: Committee

  4. 24 September 1990

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5269 with 3 hours 0 of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, as modified by the amendments printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. Only the amendments printed in Part 2 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be in order. Said amendments shall be considered in the order and manner specified in the report, and may be offered only by the Member specified or his designee. All points of order against the amendments printed in the report ar...

    Source: Floor

  5. 24 September 1990

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 25 September 1990

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 25 September 1990

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 166 - 258 (Roll no. 376).

    Source: Floor

  8. 25 September 1990

    Vote

    Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 166 - 258 (Roll no. 376).

    Source: Floor

  9. 25 September 1990

    Vote

    On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 244 - 180 (Roll no. 374).

    Source: Floor

  10. 25 September 1990

    Floor

    Mr. Walker moved to reconsider ordering the previous question.

    Source: Floor

  11. 25 September 1990

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  12. 25 September 1990

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 24 September 1990

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.