Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 486 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 5099) to provide for the restoration of fish and wildlife and their habitat in the Central Valley of California, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

16 June 1992

Last action

17 June 1992 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Beilenson, Anthony C. [D-CA-24]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 5099 (Central Valley water project).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 June 1992

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 147.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 16 June 1992

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5099 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs now printed in the bill as an original bill and all points of order against said substitute shall be waived. It shall be in order to consider en bloc the amendments numbered 1 printed in the report accompanying this resolution and said amendments shall not be subject to a division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against amendments No. 2 and 3 printed in the report for failure to comply with clause 7, rule XVI are waived. After passage of the bill, it shall be in order to consider a motion to take from t...

    Source: Floor

  3. 16 June 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-572, by Mr. Beilenson.

    Source: Committee

  4. 16 June 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-572, by Mr. Beilenson.

    Source: Committee

  5. 16 June 1992

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 17 June 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 17 June 1992

    Passed

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  8. 17 June 1992

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  9. 17 June 1992

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 17 June 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  11. 17 June 1992

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 16 June 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.